<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Can the Voting Rights Act Survive Supreme Court Review?</title>
		<description>Discuss Can the Voting Rights Act Survive Supreme Court Review?</description>
		<link>http://www.michronicleonline.com/index.php/local/breaking-news/8657-can-the-voting-rights-act-survive-supreme-court-review</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.michronicleonline.com/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/8657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Section 2 is all about segregation</title>
			<link>http://www.michronicleonline.com/index.php/local/breaking-news/8657-can-the-voting-rights-act-survive-supreme-court-review#comment-1033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here's why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in unconstitutiona l and ought to be struck down by the Supreme Court: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/14/overturn-unconstitutiona l-voting-rights-act]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Roger Clegg, Ctr for</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.michronicleonline.com/index.php/local/breaking-news/8657-can-the-voting-rights-act-survive-supreme-court-review#comment-1033</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
